Fantasy Review: The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss

186074

2.5/5 Stars

So I finally read The Name of the Wind after it had been sitting on my bookshelf for over a year. Actually, I’d picked it up, tried to get through the Prologue, and given up more than once. There was just something about that melodramatic, purple-prose-y introduction that turned me off. But eventually, a recommendation from my sister got me to power through and give it an honest go.

Now, I don’t want anyone to get all up in arms about this being a two star review; it’s probably actually a 2.5 as it was better than okay and I really did like the story. But this is another book that, for my tastes, could have used a heavy-handed editor. There is no doubt in my mind that Rothfuss is a talented writer. He has built an intriguing world, the mechanics of magic are well thought out, and his prose has moments of stunning clarity and true beauty in equal measures. But much of what I liked about this book was drown out by a lot of over-written, repetitive metaphors and a tendency to belabour ideas until I stopped caring about them.

I think The Name of the Wind is a five star book that is being smothered by itself. In my opinion, Rothfuss would not have needed to add anything to gain a five star review from me; it’s in there. He just needed to trim the fat a little more closely—okay, a lot more closely—for it to be visible. And I also recognize that this style of writing is exactly what some people love, and I do understand why so many people have given it 4-5 stars. I get bored reading Tolkien, too. So shoot me.

My biggest issue with the prose is that much of the imagery just doesn’t make sense. For example “The man had true-red hair, red as flame.” (Pg. 1, and elsewhere). Now, I don’t know about you, but I have pretty much never seen a red flame. A candle-flame is nearly white, with soft yellow and orange edges. Flame in a fireplace is mostly yellow and orange as well, with some white and blue. I’ve even seen green flame; try lighting a Cheeto on fire. But I’ve never seen a red flame. Am I crazy? Is there some magical red fire that I don’t know about? Please tell me I’m not the only one! And the image is used constantly throughout the text. This might seem like nit-picking. If it was the only image that seemed off to me, I’d probably let it slide. But The Name of the Wind is rife with them.

And the images that do make sense are often followed immediately by other, less ideal images. “[The cuts] gaped redly against the innkeeper’s fair skin, as if he had been slashed with a barber’s razor or a piece of broken glass.” (Pg. 40) Do we really need both? The image of broken glass, to me, is the more effective one. It evokes a violent, ragged wound. The barber’s razor would leave comparatively cleaner, more sanitary looking cut. Either way, the two images are at odds with one another. Which is it?

Similarly, “Kote’s voice cut like a saw through bone…He spoke so softly that Chronicler had to hold his breath to hear” (Pg. 45). I find these images contradictory. It’s distracting to have one thing described in multiple, contradictory ways. These two examples are not the worst, they are just the ones I happened across on a brief scan of the first few pages. I actually wish I’d made note of the imagery I liked and the imagery that didn’t work so that I could articulate this issue more clearly. But I didn’t. And I’m not going to re-read the thing just to prove a point. Other reviewers have gone to the trouble already, I’m sure.

Other things that bugged me: too many types of currency (can we at least have an index to reference, please?), unnecessary changes to days of the week (again, please proved a reference, because the names themselves are arbitrary and confusing), names of languages do not necessarily match their place of origin (again, this would be fine if there was an index, but there’s not and it’s confusing), the constant use of names in conversation (when two people are talking to each other, they don’t usually start every sentence with the other’s name… that’s just weird), the story within a story within a story format (sometimes it works great and I like the effort and detail Rothfuss has put into the mythology, but the main Chronicler/Kvothe bookending comes across as extremely contrived), the convenient plot resolutions (there is literally no conflict that doesn’t just magically resolve itself without direct input from Kvothe)… but not enough for me to dwell on. I can forgive the convenience of the plot because I found the rest of the world satisfyingly complex. I recognize that the Arabian Nights style narrative is just not to my personal taste. The other issues on their own wouldn’t bother me that much, but together they cry out for an editor.

There is one issue that is difficult for me to get past, however. And that is how everything is “the best.” Sure, Kvothe’s a Gary Sue, but that doesn’t really irk me. It’s a common enough problem that, if the rest of the book is up to snuff, I tend to just ignore this problem. But not only is Kvothe a Gary Sue, but it’s like everything he touches is the best of the best.

The Edema Ruh (the name of which will always remind me of the terrible swelling I had during pregnancy) are Gary Sue style performers. Everything they do is described as so completely without compare that I don’t believe in them. They don’t make mistakes. They know every song and story that ever existed. They are flawless and boring.
Kvothe’s mastery of the lute and his song-writing are so heartbreakingly beautiful that he stuns everyone wherever he goes. But this doesn’t leave any room for people who don’t like the lute, maybe, or who prefer a different style of music. No. He is just amazing and everyone who hears him recognizes it instantly. And every time I read one of the songs he’s written, I am heartbroken. Heartbrokenly underwhelmed.

Similarly, Kvothe’s description of the love of his life is so over the top perfect (in Kvothe’s mind) that she is immediately disappointing when we meet her. And the problem is that what one person finds attractive may or may not jive with what another person finds attractive. We don’t all have the same taste in men/women, or music, or wine. There is no such thing as “the best,” nothing is perfect to everyone. It is self-defeating to describe anything so simplistically. These characters couldn’t live up to their own hype. No one could. And it’s not that Rothfuss isn’t up to the task, it’s that no one is. There is no perfect description of anything that will satisfy every reader. So don’t even try. Seriously.

Anyway, enough of the negatives. I want to get back to what I like about this book. Rothfuss has done a great thing in building this world. It may not be the most unique fantasy world ever created. And it doesn’t need to be. It is whole and believable. The magic works without becoming a convenient plot device (one of the few easy outs that isn’t taken advantage of, interestingly), the world mythology is rich and complex and integral to the story (this is a huge, impressive achievement), the characters are varied and interesting, the story is multifaceted and engaging. There are a lot of good things going on with this novel. Sadly, I really do feel like it’s a 5 star book hiding in a 2.5 star body.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Fantasy Review: The Name of the Wind by Patrick Rothfuss

  1. Hmmm your review is fascinating and informative. This is one of my favorite books but I think I was too caught up in the magical world to notice the contradictions or things that would normally irk me within a story. I think also didn’t have a problem with Rothfuss’ writing because it was so uniquely his own and different from anything else that I had previously read.

    When I reread the book I will definitely look closely for the things you have mentioned. I would be interested to hear your take on the second book as I felt the writing differed greatly from the first book in the trilogy.

    1. Thanks for taking the time to comment!

      I think part of the reason some of these things stood out to me is that I read it aloud to my husband (weird, I know, but he’s a truck driver and one of the ways we stay in touch while he’s on the road is I play audio-book). Then you really notice when particular turns of phrase are repeated too often, or when descriptions don’t make sense (he’d ask for clarification to see if he’d heard right, and then I’d have to go back and double check).

      I liked The Wise Man’s Fear better, actually, which for many reviewers was not the case. I felt the writing was more polished. Less purple prose, less repetitive/contradictory images.

      I wish I’d taken not of some of the really good and really bad bits of imagery he used (sometimes one right after another, which totally overshadowed his good imagery–some of it was really fantastic) Trying to find it after the fact is impossible!

      But, for the case of repetitive images, (without page numbers, as this is just from memory) I think in The Name of the Wind, female characters touched/played with their hair and bit their lips in conversations with Kvothe at least 200 times. Pretty much every encounter with a female character used one or both of those images. I would never have noticed if I wasn’t reading it out loud; I would have just glossed over it. Same with the overuse of personal pronouns. It just becomes awkward when you’re reading it aloud, you realize how unnatural it sounds.

      But I love the story. I love the world. For the most part I love the characters. I will definitely be reading the third! I just can’t help but feel like Rothfuss was failed by his editors (if he even had any), because he has a much better book here than what was presented to us. Less so for The Wise Man’s Fear, the edits seemed a little tighter. And hopefully by the third we’ll really see what Rothfuss is made of. I think he’s very talented.

      1. I definitely understand where you’re coming from, I think the Name of the Wind is one of those books that is meant to be enjoyed by reading to yourself and not thinking too much, just basking in the beauty. 🙂

  2. Thanks for the review. I recently read this book and enjoyed it. Same as for you, the prologue almost kept me from reading the rest of the book but once the story got going it sucked me in.

    I found the ending a bit lacking, and it is obvious that it has a sequel however I wanted something more for my efforts in reading through this long tome.

    All in all an enjoyable adventure and some lovely characters. I would give it 3.5 stars.

    1. Thanks for reading!

      Yes, I think you’re definitely intended to commit to all three once you start. The first one barely scratches the surface of the story, although it give you enough to suck you in. Have you tried the second in the trilogy yet? The Wise Man’s Fear is a little more polished on the language side of things, but is still all just background information.

      Rothfuss is an excellent world builder, there’s no doubt about that. But now I want to see some action! I gave the second one 3.5 stars. I’m hoping the third will be the 4-5 star book he’s clearly capable of 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s